CINet Award to VTT service researchers

VTT researchers Inka Lappalainen, Maaria Nuutinen, Tiina Valjakka and Toni Ahonen received the Mariano Corso Best Practical Implications Award for their paper at the 15th CINet Conference that was held in Budapest, Hungary on 7-9 September 2014. The paper was titled “Situated Provider-Customer Interaction as an Arena for Continuous Service Innovations”.

Mariano Corso Best Practical Implications Award is given for a paper which combines academic relevance and rigor with a clear application for the research and easy adaptation for practical use.

The Continuous Innovation Network (CINet) is a global network set up to bring together researchers and industrialists working in the field of Continuous Innovation. The theme of the 15th conference was “Operating Innovation – Innovating Operations”

CINet

(photo courtesy to Tamás Thaler)

Additional information: inka.lappalainen[a]vtt.fi

Why value co-creation?

In this post I want to elaborate a point I made in the end of my previous “Going beyond ‘producers’ and ‘consumers’” post about the co-created nature of value. Why does service-dominant (S-D) logic talk about value co-creation and not about value creation?

In the traditional company-centric notion of value and value creation, value is measured by monetary terms and is something that companies create through production [1]. In this logic value is seen as something that can be embedded into company outputs such as products to make them desirable by the customers. The customers must purchase the products in order to consume the value (hence value is ‘destroyed’ while products are used).

Value creation1

S-D logic abandons the conventional logic and instead, introduces the notion of value-in-context [2], in which the customer becomes an active participant into the process of value creation. Value-in-context eliminates the company’s sole right for value creation by arguing that value actually emerges in the context of the customer when the provided service (applied resources) is integrated with other resources to achieve a wanted outcome. Hence, value is always uniquely perceived by a service beneficiary and it unfolds over time. For example this text has no value on its own when it just exists in our blog. It only becomes valuable when you read it and (if) my thoughts are connected with yours.

Based on this some have actually come to the conclusion that it is only the customer who should be called as a value creator, while the company is left with the role of a value facilitator [3].

Value co-creation2

This argument is, however, missing a crucial point. Service-for-service exchange is always reciprocal by nature meaning that both the customer and the company are simultaneously service providers and service beneficiaries. In other words, both customers and companies can be seen as resource integrating actors engaged in service provision and value co-creation both for themselves and others [2]. This actor-to-actor (A2A) perspective is fundamental to the S-D logic worldview. It is also critical, if we really want to understand the complexity of the world (and business).

Value co-creation3

Thus, S-D logic further broadens our view on value co-creation by arguing that service-for-service exchange does not occur in dyadic relationships (between two actors), but in larger ecosystems of value co-creating actors [4]. This means that when trying to achieve a certain outcome you never integrate resource from only one source (e.g. one company). Instead, a huge number of actors, scattered over time and space, are participating in the joint process of value co-creation.

Value co-creation4

If the idea of value co-creation has not convinced you yet – think of this very moment. In order for you to be able to read my blog post, you need to have a laptop or some other device equipped with an internet connection, some way of finding my text (e.g. Google) and the ability to read (just to name a few things). Can you imagine how many people’s effort has been needed to make this moment of (potential) value co-creation possible? I can’t. The greatest strength of human kind is to be able to collaborate in ways that well exceeds the understanding of a single individual.

References:

[1] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1-17.

[2] Chandler, J.D. & Vargo, S.L. (2011) Contextualization: Network Intersections, Value-in-Context, and the Co-Creation of Markets, Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35-49.

[3] Grönroos, C. (2011) Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279-301.

[4] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2011) It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management 40, 181-187.

Pohjoisen palvelutapahtuma, Northern Service Day, oli jälleen menestys!

Northern Service Day järjestettiin toistamiseen Oulussa 30.1.2014 taidonnäytteenä Pohjois-Suomen toimijoiden yhteistyöstä. Paikalla oli 250 henkilöä oppimassa, keskustelemassa ja innostumassa palveluajattelusta.

Tapahtuman avauspuheenvuorossa Finnish Service Alliancen puheenjohtaja Marja Toivonen korosti, kuinka asiakkaan ongelman ratkaisu – eli palveleminen ja asiakasarvon luominen – on toimintatapa, jolla niin yksityiset kuin julkiset toimijat tulevat menestymään: ”Asiakkaaseen tulisi suhtautua kumppanina, ei vain myynnin kohteena”. Tarvitaan siis luottamusta ja verkostoissa toimimisen taitoa. Pelkällä teknologian tai tuotteiden tarjoamisella ei pärjätä. Tässä on ajattelutavanmuutoksen paikka useille suomalaisille organisaatioille.

NSD2014_näkymä_lavalta

Kuva: Lauri Salovaara, FilmME

Tilaisuudessa kuultiin myös loistavaa paneelikeskustelua, jossa menestyneet pohjoissuomalaiset toimijat kertoivat tarinoita tosielämästä. He kuvasivat kuinka ovat luoneet maailmalla menestyneitä palveluratkaisuja. Paneelissa keskustelivat Lauri Antila (JOT Automation), Pekka Paurola (1bar, J Pubi, Coctail Trading Company Oy), Lauri Salovaari (FilmMe), Olli Löytynoja (BusinessOulu), Satu Miettinen (Lapin yliopisto) ja Marja Toivonen (VTT). Keskustelua moderoi Janne Mustonen BusinessOulusta ja sen veti yhteen Lasse Mitronen Aalto-yliopistosta TEKES:n SERVE-ohjelman pitkäaikaisena puheenjohtajana. Panelistien sekä aamupäivän keskustelua voi kuvata esimerkiksi yleisön oheisilla twiiteillä:

  • ”@KatriinaJuoperi: Asiakkaita on erilaisia, mutta harva asiakas arvostaa huonoa palvelua. – Pekka Paurola, baariyrittäjä #NorthernServiceDay”
  • ”@katimik: Vaativat asiakkaat on lottovoitto. #northernserviceday”.
  • @KatriinaJuoperi: Palveluntarjoajan tärkein tehtävä on asiakastarpeen selvittäminen. Marja Toivonen, VTT #NorthernServiceDay #Oulu #yrittäjyys”
  • ‏”@nilsers: Asiakastarpeen määrittely on vuorovaikutusprosessi. #nsd #northernserviceday”‏
  • @NiinaJortikka: Osaava asiakas on resurssi palveluntarjoajalle #NorthernServiceDay #.”
  • ”@nilsers: Kumppanien menestys siivittää myös omaa menestymistä. #verkostoituminen #nsd #northernserviceday”
  • @nilsers: Oulun alueen yritysten täytyy verkostoitua kansainvälistymisessä. #nsd #northernserviceday”.

Iltapäivällä tilaisuuden järjestäjät pitivät työpajoja, joissa osallistujille tarjottiin mahdollisuus oppia konkreettisia menetelmiä ja lähestymistapoja palveluosaamiseen. Työpajoissa tarjoiltiin case-esimerkkien ja yhteisen tekemisen kautta ratkaisuja esimerkiksi seuraaviin aiheisiin: miten yritys voi muuttua palvelukeskeiseksi toimijaksi, miten asiakas voidaan ottaa mukaan kehittämiseen kumppaniksi ja millaisia ratkaisuja palvelumuotoilu tarjoaa. Lisäksi työpajoissa käsiteltiin mm. muuttuvaa ja verkostomaista liiketoimintamallia, palveluprototyyppejä ja palvelun yhteiskehittämistä.

NSD 2014 työpajoja

Kuva: Pekka Moilanen, FixUI Oy

Kiitos tilaisuudesta kuuluu kaikille järjestäjille ja aktiiviselle yleisölle! Tilaisuutta järjestämässä olivat: Oulun kaupunki, BusinessOulu, Lapin yliopisto, Oulun yliopisto, Oulun ammattikorkeakoulu, VTT, Palo, Fixui, Fluente, Soul4Design ja OBN.  Lisäksi tilaisuutta tukivat Tekes sekä Finnish Service Alliance ja sen koordinoivat Kaisa Still ja Katri Kallio VTT:ltä.

Tapaamisiin taas ensi vuonna Northern Service Day:ssä!

Järjestäjien puolesta,

Katri Kallio ja Kaisa Still

Going beyond ‘producers’ and ‘consumers’

Categorization is an important tool in the human sense making process. We often tend to look at the world around us and study things and phenomena by trying to understand how they differ from each other. To a point this is a very good practice – it enables us to organize the chaos around us. However, there is no ‘one best way’ to categorize. Hence, as our understanding of the world and of ourselves grows, we need to reframe the categories we use for interpreting the world. This is when the challenge arises. The ‘traditional’ categories are so deeply ingrained in us that they become more of a constraining force than an enabling one. They hinder our ability to see things in a new way.

One of the aims of service-dominant (S-D) logic [1] is to make us to see beyond the traditional categorizations that constrain our understanding of marketing and business in general. It does this by offering concepts that transcend the conventional categories we use in our everyday lives. One of these is the concept of service – applying your skills and knowledge for the benefit of another – that overcomes the separation of products and services (for more information see my previous post). This time, however, I’m going to focus on another conventional categorization – that of dividing the world into ‘producers’ and ‘consumers’.

If exaggerating a little – and a little really is enough – the traditional story goes like this: the world of business consists of ‘producers’, who make things of necessity and value, and of ‘consumers’ who buy and consume these things and then come back to ask for more. In other words, the ‘producer’ is seen as a creator of value and the ‘consumer’ as a destroyer of value [2] (or at least as a very passive participant of whatever is going on).

Producers and consumers

Instead of this imbalanced and one-directional logic of business and value creation, S-D logic suggests that all actors, such as individual people (me) or groups of people like households (my family), companies (my employer, grocery store, cell phone manufacturer), etc. actually are doing fundamentally the same thing: engaging in exchange to create value for themselves [3]. This is done through offering service – the application of my knowledge and skills for somebody else – in order to receive service – application of other person’s knowledge and skills for my benefit – in return. In the modern world this direct service-for-service exchange is often masked by money (the right for service) as the service that I can provide is not what the person or persons, whose service I would need, really want. Instead, I work (provide service) for a company, who pays me money by which I can acquire service from somebody else. It is this thick soup of service-for-service exchanges that creates the complex systems of interconnected actors that co-create value together. Why co-create? Because, whether we want it or not, none of us could do it all by ourselves.

Resource integrators

References:

[1] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1-17.

[2] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2011) It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management 40, 181-187

[3] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36, 1-10.

Northern Service Day tulee jälleen—oletko valmis!

NSD-logoehd3_nodate

Viime vuonna suuren suosion saavuttanut ja ’loppuun myyty’ Northern Service Day järjestetään jälleen torstaina 30.1.2014 Oulun Lasaretissa. Tule mukaan keskustelemaan menestyneiden pohjoissuomalaisten yrittäjien sekä palveluliiketoiminnan huippuasiantuntijoiden kanssa. Täällä kertaa pääroolissa ovat verkostoitumalla menestyneet pohjoissuomalaiset yritykset. Päivän aikana pääset tutustumaan minkälaista palveluosaamista sisältävillä ratkaisuilla ja liiketoimintamalleilla menestys on luotu.

Omista kokemuksistaan kertomassa mm.

  • Lauri Salovaara, FilmMe Oy
  • Lauri Antila, JOT Automation
  • Aki Mursu, Kauppuri5

Mielenkiintoisten puheenvuorojen lisäksi pääset itse kokemaan ammattilaisten järjestämissä työpajoissa, mitä verkostomainen palveluajattelu liiketoiminnan kannalta käytännössä tarkoittaa ja miten matkan varrella vastaan tulevat haasteet voidaan ylittää.

Tilaisuus on maksuton ja paikkoja rajoitetusti, joten varaa omasi ajoissa!

Tervetuloa! Lisätietoa ja ilmoittautumiset: http://www.ouka.fi/oulu/northern-service-day

Northern Service Day 2014 -tilaisuuden järjestävät Finnish Service Alliance, Business Oulu, Oulun kaupunki, Oulun Yliopisto, Oulun Seudun Ammattikorkeakoulu, Lapin yliopisto ja VTT. 

Digitization makes ‘service’ visible

In one of my previous posts, I wrote how service-dominant (S-D) logic enables us to see that it’s really all about service, and also that what we are witnessing nowadays is not so much a services revolution but a service realization. How has the world changed then? And what is it that enables us to see service-for-service exchange more clearly today?

One of the main reasons for the service realization is the evolution of technology, and digitization in particular. In his book Richard Normann [1] talks about dematerilization, i.e. how digital technology is enabling the separation of knowledge and information from the constrains of the physical world. This does not of course mean that information will flow without any physical objects − on the contrary, complex infrastructure is needed but once the infrastructure is in place information is able, at least in principle, to travel with infinite speed and to exist everywhere in real time. Hence, the tremendous impact of technology is in its ability to loosen constraints and by doing so to increase density for value co-creation by making more resources available anytime and anywhere. In S-D logic’s terms digitization enables service (applying knowledge and skills for the benefit of others) to break free from the physical service vehicles that were needed before to support service provision [2].

So what does all this mean in practice? Last time I gave you an example of how, based on the traditional logic, me telling you my thoughts face-to-face or via a book changes the nature of my ‘offering’ from a service to a product. S-D logic, however, would actually argue that I am applying my knowledge for somebody elses benefit, i.e. providing service, in both cases. This service it can be provided either directly or indirectly (through a tangible object).

This example was okay, but not really what I did, right? Instead of telling you my thoughts in person or through a printed book, I digitized them. Basically this meant that I wrote my thoughts down in a Word document with my laptop and published them at our blog. I could also have shared them differently, e.g. record a video of me telling this and posting it somewhere in the Internet. If we are looking at all this from the traditional viewpoint and trying to determine whether we are talking about products or services things get complicated. The blog and its contents or the video would probably be considered as intangible (you can’t really touch them) and due to this characterized as a service. However in order to access these “services” you need to have some kind of a tangible device with an internet connection (to put it very simple). Due to the digital nature of my service (my thoughts in the blog), it is not constrained in a single tangible object, e.g. a specific computer, but accessible through numerous different tangible devices. Hence, digitization enables us to see the direct-indirect continuum of service more clearly and makes it unnecessary to divide the world into outputs called products and services.

Digitization

References:

[1] Normann, R. (2001) Reframing Business: When the map changes the Landscape, Chichester, England: Wiley.
[2] Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L. & O’Brien, M. (2011) Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83 (1), 5-18.

Service research gains more momentum at VTT

VTT is undergoing a large restructuration process and the new organizational structure will be effective from the beginning of the year 2014. One of the guiding principles behind the transformation is to more strongly connect technological and business aspects of research together. At the same time the aim is to increase both the scientific and the societal impact of the research carried out at VTT. This is good news for service research as it is increasingly acknowledged that the service perspective relates to all business. Along with the spread of the service-dominant (S-D) logic perspective, it is realized that service provision is the enabler of value co-creation and that value is always co-created with customers. Therefore, service business is not limited to specific types of industries or products, but it is the fundamental basis of all economic activity.

OpportunitiesVTT’s has strong expertise in service networks and value chains. In the last couple of years this competence has been enriched by the ecosystem perspective that emphasizes the dynamics and dependences among the actors. VTT excels in studying these dependencies e.g. by system modelling methods. In VTT’s new organization the ecosystem perspective is explicitly emphasized when defining new Expert Areas; this perspective is important for both traditional and newly developing industries.

In addition, major emphasis is placed on innovation and foresight. In business development it is not enough to consider current challenges, but the aim should be in identifying the future opportunities for innovation.  VTT is one of the few research organizations in the world, who is actively combining S-D logic and innovation research together. S-D logic highlights the importance of innovations that change the logic of markets and are not limited to specific products or services. An important question is how innovations gain ground in markets – to answer this question S-D logic examines the process of institutionalization of novelties.

VTT has a dual role of being a research organization and a provider of knowledge-intensive expert services. This combination creates a challenge of how to simultaneously serve our customers here and now in the best possible way, and to increase our knowledge and competences in the long run so that we can serve them also in the future. For VTT’s business research this means that we have increasingly ‘package’ our competences and make them visible. Already now VTT has several tools, such as business models and service productization models, that can act as the basis for such packages. Collaboration between the experts in VTT is increasingly required in order to apply these models together with our customers. In addition, collaboration is needed among the broader research community – in Finland and internationally.

The future prospects for VTT’s service and business research look promising, but making them reality requires intensive work from us all.

Marja Toivonen, Research Professor

Naples Forum – Emerging nature of value

“Service has arrived in a new and better shape, more prepared to deal with the contemporary economy. Still this is a starting point: Service deserves more attention on our research agenda!”  (clip of Reasoning for Naples Forum on Service)

We had a great opportunity take part to the third Naples Forum on Service, which is conference focusing on three research pillars: service-dominant logic, service science and network and systems theory. The conference was located in beautiful island of Ischia in close distance from city of Naples in Italy. In addition to thrilling views, sunny sky and bright blue oceans, conference offered us many research related experiences and insights, which have notable future value potential. Instead of explaining what we found valuable for us during the conference, in the following we debate how and when value of conferences can be actualized.

Conference as a platform for co-creating value

When sitting on an airplane on my way back to home from the conference I started to think about the value of Naples forum for me and for VTT. The probable reason for my thoughts was that this question is often asked after conference (to justify the made investment). On the other hand, another apparent reason was that during the conference we had many interesting presentations and informal discussions about the concept of value and value co-creation. After short puzzling, I realized that this type of conference does not create value per se, but enables opportunities for value co-creation among the participants. Thereby, conference should be seen as a platform for value co-creation, which enables researchers all over the world to present and discuss their ideas, take ideas to next level by challenging them, plant seeds for new ideas, co-operation and joint projects, create new relationships to other academics or even build life-long friendship to other like-minded people.

But how is my subjective value experience in the end created? When going through many unforgettable experiences from the conference I realized that my subjective value during the conference emerged through various types of incidents that I had experienced (e.g. inspiring presentations, feedback to my work, gala dinner with amazing people). However, because value is context specific, the value of these incidents change in time depending, for example, on where I will be, what will I do, and how I can complement these experiences with other things. Therefore, importance of certain incident at the conference may seem today irrelevant (low value), but future may reveal this incident highly valuable.

Furthermore, conference presented us numerous opportunities to co-create value in the future. Firstly, the conference is so full of interesting presentations and discussions, that you need some time on your own to process these ideas and insights. In addition, the value of the conference may be revealed later on when insights from the conference are combined with insights from other sources (e.g. resulting in to a finding of original idea for PhD. thesis). Secondly, I would argue that the most of the value for me and especially for the VTT will be actualized after the conference through realizing numerous opportunities that this type of collaboration enables (e.g research exchange, joint projects).  Thereby, if someone would ask what was the value of Naples Forum, I would explain that it was very educative, inspiring, fun, warm and warm-hearted conference, but in order to understand full value of conference we will have to see what the future reveals.

What is Naples Forum on Service?

The Naples Forum on Service is mostly academic conference, which built around three scientific pilars which are service-dominant logic, networks & systems theory and service science. First Naples Forum was organised in 2009 at the small island of Capri. The idea of the conference was to overcame geographical constrains and bring researchers interested in service research together to share ideas and discuss informally with each other. This year Naples Forum was organised for the third time, and the forum is nowadays recognized as a conference where most influential service academics are present, but at the same time the atmosphere has remained very open and relaxed. Next Naples forum is scheduled to be organised in 2015.

 

It is all about service

The first fundamental premise of the service-dominant (S-D) logic says that service is the fundamental basis of exchange [1]. In other words ─ all business is actually service business. This sounds quite straightforward. However, in order to truly capture what is meant by this statement we need to make clear distinction with services as traditionally understood and service as defined in the S-D logic.

In my previous post I told how I was struggling with the awkward division between services and products before I found the S-D logic literature. Traditionally, we view services and products as something very different from each other, to an extent that there seems to be quite strong confrontation between the two. Due to the triumphs of the industrial era, our attention has been steered towards making tangible outputs, i.e. products. For a long time, service was ignored almost altogether and treated either as an add-on to the core product or as a residual. These intangible outputs are described with the plural term of “services”. Many times the nature of services is mainly described by listing how they differ from products (e.g. charahteristics such as intangibility, heterogeneity, inseparability, perishability). Services are thought to be something tied to a direct interaction among people, while products are easily distributed and stored.

Services vs. products

One of the aims of the S-D logic is to overcome the products versus services (or tangible vs. intangible output) divide by offering a transcending concept of service [2]. The singular term service, as used in the S-D logic, focuses on the processes of serving rather than on the form of output. Therefore, service in the S-D logic is defined as the application of specialized competences (such as knowledge and skills) for the benefit of another actor [3]. Hence, service is a process that respresents the basis of all social and economic exchange.

Service

This transcending view enables us to examine all kinds of market offering independent of their form and output related characteristics. What this means is that, ironically, there are no services in S-D logic. Products, however, still exist and they have an important role as vehicles for service provision. In other words, a service can be delivered to a customer indirectly through a product. Service (the process of applying one’s resources for another’s benefit) can therefore be seen as a continuum where there exists both direct service and indirect service.

Service - direct and indirect

I’ll give an example of this. If I would be telling you this same thing face to face, hence applying my knowledge for your benefit, it would be regarded as a service also by the traditional thinking. In the S-D logic this would be considered as a direct service. If I would write the same thing down on a piece of paper and print a book out of it, it would be regarded as a product by the traditional logic, though the same underlying service still exists. With the S-D logic lenses on we will still acknowledge the underlying service, though this time it is provided indirectly through a service vehicle, the tangible book, through which I am able to offer my service more independent of time and my physical location. Hence, it is unnecessary to make a divide between products and services, especially as this kind of division seems to steer our attention so much to the particular service vehicle that we forget the underlying service altogether.

Usually, the increasing attention towards service(s) is seen necessary due to the emerging “services revolution” (e.g. that approximately 70 % of economic activity in developing countries is in something categorized as services, i.e. non-products). If we adopt the transcending concept of service implied by the S-D logic, we can see that it has always been service that has been exchanged (either directly or indirectly through a product). Hence, what we are witnessing is not so much a service revolution, but a service realization [4].

References:

[1] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2008) Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36, 1-10.
[2] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2011) It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management 40, 181-187.
[3] Vargo, S.L. & Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1-17.
[4] Vargo, S.L. & Akaka, M.A. (2009) Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications. Service Science 1(1), 32-41.

Researcher’s (r)evolution

As this blog is written by a team instead of a single author, it is rich in a way that it consists of several voices stemming from different backgrounds, perspectives and world views. We’ve already written few posts about our team’s efforts to increasing communication and discussion on what matters the most: the substance of our research. As human beings we use language and words when describing our thoughts and ideas. Words are tricky though. They enable us to share our thoughts and ideas, but at the same time they restrict our thinking and always leave room for misinterpretation and misunderstanding.

With this post, I am for the first time in this blog giving a voice for my own thoughts concerning the actual research I am doing and, more importantly, would like to do. I’m quite cautious in doing so as I am going through a phase in which I am really redefining my research and my identity as a researcher. Some might argue that aren’t we all the time in this process of redefining ourselves and shaping our identities and I do agree with that. However, maybe there are periods when this process is more incremental and unobtrusive by its nature and other periods when it is more radical and striking. Right now I feel that I am experiencing the latter.

Value_storiesOne of the most critical turning points for me as a researcher happened slightly over a year ago on an evening flight from Madrid to Helsinki. But before going to that moment in more detail, I need to tell a little more about my background as a researcher. I’ve been a doctoral student in marketing already for several years. In the beginning, I used concepts such as user innovation, lead user approach and consumer needs to describe my dissertation topic. Gradually, my research interests developed more towards co-design methods (e.g. Owela) and understanding “consumers” in the context of their lives. Hence, research on understanding people and being able to combine knowledge from multiple sources in order to create something new has always been close to my heart. However, even when I felt that I was doing an important job in trying to get the voice of the consumer/user heard and understood by the companies providing solutions, something in the way I was approaching the whole phenomenon just felt wrong for me. Another issue with which I have been struggling quite hard are the actual solutions that I am dealing with. They are very technology-intensive digital solutions including both tangible and intangible elements, hence how should I characterize them; as products or as services?

On that evening flight, at the time when I was struggling with these issues the hardest, I started reading the article “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic of Marketing” by Stephen L. Vargo and Robert F. Lusch [1]. And then it just hit me! Service-dominant (S-D) logic provided me a new way of seeing the world so that I could find the answers for many of the questions that I had been pondering about. I could see a glimpse of a world without the artificial division between products and services and without labelling actors to e.g. consumers and producers. Even though I now have seen a glimpse of the alternative way, I still constantly find myself falling back to the traps of what Vargo and Lusch [1] call the goods-dominant or manufacturer-dominant logic especially when interacting with the “real world” that so heavily builds on the lexicon of this conventional world view.

I hope that this blog could serve as a sense making platform for me as well as for all my team members in the (r)evolution we are going through as researchers. Welcome to be part of our journeys!

Reference:

[1] Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68 (January), 1-17.